When more than one lab tests the same batch, we line up their results side by side. When they match, it is the strongest signal you can get. When they do not, that is information too. Here is what these labs found — you decide.
2 independent labs tested this batch of CJC-1295 (no-DAC) from Peptides For Sale. Their purity results ranged from 93.4% to 93.4%.
The labs agree
Independent labs landed within 2 points of each other on purity. That is the strongest signal you can get on a batch.
Insufficient data
·
Poor · 1.0
The two badges above are our blended RV-score view: whether the scores agree, and the overall quality tier. The plain read at the top leads with the labs actual purity numbers, and the full per-lab table is below.
CJC-1295 (no-DAC) from Peptides For Sale
batch 009 · cross-tested by 2 independent labs
Not enough comparable measurements to classify agreement.
✓ Batch identity basis: Same physical sample (Finnrick multi-lab program)
All records carry Finnrick (FNR-*) task IDs, meaning one physical vial was routed by Finnrick to multiple labs and each lab tested it independently. This is the strongest basis for 'same batch' — there's no batch heterogeneity between labs because there's no batch difference: it's the same vial.
⚠ 2 records in this group failed QC.
Flagged "FAILED QC" in the table below with the specific reason. Failure markers are categorical, not continuous measurements — they're excluded from the agreement / outlier math (a vial that failed isn't an "unusually low purity"). They remain visible because a buyer should know a vial in this batch failed.
🧞 Identity caveat — Distinct molecule from CJC-1295 DAC (DAC adds Drug Affinity Complex → days-long half-life). Bare 'CJC-1295' resolves here per peptide-research market convention: ≥99% of bare-term COAs are no-DAC (Mod GRF 1-29). Vendors advertising DAC form state so explicitly. If a record's DAC/no-DAC matters for downstream analysis, verify against the COA notes — do not blindly trust this resolution.
Labs
2
Tests
3
RV Score Mean
1.00
RV Score Spread
—
Content Mean
—
Content: —
Content Range
—
CV —
Per-Lab Breakdown
| Lab | Task | Test Date | RV | Purity | Content | Testing | Label | Custody | CI | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChromateFAILED QC | #FNR-zm52ilg | 1.00 | — failed | — failed | 0.0 | 7.0 | 4.3 | 6.0 | HPLC | |
| MZ Biolabs | #FNR-btp2j6z | 1.00 | 93.36% | 0 mg | 0.0 | 7.0 | 4.3 | 6.0 | HPLC | |
| MZ BiolabsFAILED QC | #FNR-56dmr6a | 1.00 | — failed | — failed | 0.0 | 7.0 | 4.3 | 6.0 | HPLC |
Why this matters: A single COA is one lab's answer from one method on one sample. Multiple labs reveal the pattern. When labs converge on the same answer, that's strong cross-validation. When they diverge — especially on content while agreeing on purity — the difference is often method-driven (different quantitation basis) but sometimes signals real product variation. ResearchVerify is the only platform that surfaces both cases automatically across thousands of cross-tests.